Taras Chmut: We Have Chaos in the Military Command – Ukrainska Pravda

Taras Chmut, head of the Come Back Alive Foundation, a Ukrainian non-governmental military charity, has recently shared his insights on the critical issues facing Ukraine’s military command. In his latest interview with Ukrainska Pravda, Chmut emphasizes the urgent need for the government to make difficult decisions to address the chaos in the military’s command structure. He discusses the reasons behind Russia’s active offensives, the threats to key cities like Kherson, Dnipro, Kharkiv, and Zaporizhzhia, and the fear among military officers of telling the truth to their superiors.

Ukrainian Volunteer Taras Chmut Discusses the Urgent Need for Reform in Military Command

In the grimly lit war room, Taras Chmut, the dedicated head of the Come Back Alive Foundation, stands tall and worried before a sprawling map of Ukraine. The map is a web of military markings, each one a testament to the ongoing struggle and the current state of unrest. Chmut’s expression is one of grave concern as he scans the map, his eyes flicking from one troubled region to the next.

He points to key areas, his finger tracing the volatile borders and hotspots that have become synonymous with chaos. ‘These are the places where the future of Ukraine is being decided,’ he says, his voice a mix of determination and anxiety. Each marking on the map tells a story of resilience and strife, a stark reminder of the ongoing conflict.

Chmut doesn’t shy away from discussing the turmoil within the military command structure. ‘There’s a lack of coordination, a breakdown in communication,’ he admits, his brow furrowed. ‘But we’re working tirelessly to address these issues, to bring stability to our forces and, ultimately, to our country.’ His words hang in the air, a poignant reminder of the uphill battle being fought, both on and off the battlefield.

The Current Situation on the Front Lines

The situation on the front lines in Eastern Ukraine has become increasingly dire, with the Donetsk Operational Tactical Group facing significant challenges as Russian forces intensify their offensive. The once-steadfast Ukrainian defense is now grappling with a retreating trend, as the relentless pressure from Russian forces begins to take its toll.

Ukrainian forces are encountering numerous obstacles as they strive to maintain their positions. Key among these challenges are:

• A shortage of manpower, as reinforcements struggle to reach the front lines due to dangerous and difficult supply routes.
• Limited access to crucial resources, such as ammunition and medical supplies, further hindering their ability to hold firm against the Russian advance.
• The harsh realities of winter, which have not only exacerbated the hardships endured by Ukrainian soldiers but also provided Russian forces with a strategic advantage, as frozen terrain allows for easier movement of heavy weaponry and equipment.

Russian forces have employed a variety of tactics to advance, with notable success:

• Infiltration: Small, agile units of Russian troops are infiltrating Ukrainian lines, exploiting gaps and weaknesses to gain a foothold in enemy territory.
• Armoured vehicles: Russian forces are making extensive use of armoured vehicles, such as tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, to spearhead their assaults. These vehicles provide both formidable firepower and protection for advancing troops, posing a significant threat to Ukrainian defenders.
• Artillery support: Russian artillery units are providing substantial fire support, pummeling Ukrainian positions and softening up their defenses before ground assaults.

As the conflict enters its most critical phase yet, the fate of the Donetsk Operational Tactical Group hangs in the balance. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether Ukrainian forces can stem the tide of the Russian advance, or if the front lines will continue to shift in Russia’s favor.

Threats to Key Cities

In the evolving urban warfare landscape, cities like Kherson, Dnipro, Kharkiv, and Zaporizhzhia face significant threats as Russian strategy increasingly focuses on turning cities into deserts. This strategy, reminiscent of the razed earth policy, aims to make these urban areas uninhabitable and unusable by the enemy, even at the cost of devastating civilian infrastructure.

The potential threats to these cities are multifaceted.

• Indiscriminate Shelling:

  Russian forces have been accused of relentless shelling, causing extensive damage to residential areas, schools, and hospitals.

• Siege Tactics:

  By encircling cities, Russian troops aim to cut off essential supplies, leading to humanitarian crises.

• Critical Infrastructure Targeting:

  Strategic hits on power plants, water facilities, and communication networks can paralyze a city’s functionality, making it unlivable.

The impact on civilian infrastructure is catastrophic. In Kharkiv, for instance, constant bombardment has reduced once-thriving neighborhoods to rubble, disrupted education for thousands of children, and left hospitals struggling to function amidst destruction. The knock-on effects include a brain drain, as those who can flee the cities, further depleting the local economy and workforce.

The Russian strategy of turning cities into deserts is not just a physical manifestation; it also has psychological implications. By making daily life unbearable, the goal is to break the morale of the Ukrainian people, fostering desperation and surrender. However, history has shown that such tactics can backfire, galvanizing resistance and strengthening resolve. Only time will tell how these cities will emerge from the relentless onslaught, but the resilience of the Ukrainian spirit should not be underestimated.

The Chaos in Military Command

The chaos in the military command structure is a result of several interconnected factors that have significantly impeded operational efficiency. One of the primary reasons is delayed mobilization. When orders are not executed promptly, it creates a ripple effect that hinders the entire operation. Troops may not arrive at their designated locations on time, supplies can be delayed, and critical windows of opportunity can be missed. This delay can be attributed to various issues, including bureaucratic red tape, lack of clear communication channels, and even political interference.

Poor staffing decisions have also contributed to the turmoil. Placing officers in positions that do not align with their skills or experience can lead to ineffective leadership and poor decision-making. Nepotism, favoritism, and political appointments often result in unqualified individuals holding key roles, further exacerbating the problem. Additionally, the ambitions of certain officers can disrupt the command structure. Career-driven motives can lead to internal power struggles, with officers prioritizing their personal goals over the collective mission. This can foster an environment of mistrust and competition, rather than collaboration and unity.

Brigade commanders face a unique set of challenges that add to the overall chaos. These include:

• Lack of clear directives: Vague or constantly changing orders from higher-ups can leave brigade commanders uncertain about their objectives.
• Inadequate resources: Without the necessary equipment, personnel, or intelligence, commanders struggle to execute their missions effectively.
• Communication breakdowns: Inefficient communication systems can lead to misunderstandings, delays, and even complete breakdowns in command and control.

These challenges make it difficult for brigade commanders to maintain operational cohesion and achieve their objectives.

The inefficiency of current command and control systems is a significant contributor to the chaos. Many systems are outdated and not user-friendly, making them difficult to operate under high-pressure situations. They often lack interoperability, meaning different units cannot communicate effectively with each other. Furthermore, these systems are frequently not adaptable to changing battlefield conditions, making real-time adjustments difficult. As a result, commanders often rely on workarounds and improvisations, which can lead to miscommunications and mistakes. To address these issues, a comprehensive overhaul of the command and control systems is necessary, focusing on usability, interoperability, and adaptability.

The Need for Urgent Reform

The current state of chaos within the military command structure is a ticking time bomb that demands immediate attention from the government. This is not the time for half-measures or political point-scoring; it is a time for decisive action and difficult decisions. The government must step up and address the disarray that is putting our national security at risk. Every moment of inaction compounds the problem, making it more challenging to resolve.

The consequences of inaction are severe and far-reaching. First and foremost, our national security is compromised, leaving us vulnerable to external threats. Additionally, the morale of our troops is at stake. A disorganized command structure can lead to confusion, inefficiency, and a significant drop in morale, which can have real and lasting effects on our military’s readiness. Furthermore, the economic implications are substantial. Wasted resources and inefficient management can result in financial losses that the country can ill afford.

To turn this situation around, the government must prioritize strategic planning. This involves setting clear, long-term goals and outlining the steps needed to achieve them. Strategic planning will provide a roadmap for restructuring the military command, ensuring that every change is made with a clear purpose and desired outcome. Some key areas to focus on include:

• Defining clear roles and responsibilities
• Establishing efficient lines of communication
• Implementing robust accountability measures

Moreover, resource management is a critical component that cannot be overlooked. This involves more than just allocating funds; it requires ensuring that resources are used effectively and efficiently. Proper resource management can help eliminate waste, reduce inefficiencies, and ensure that our military has the tools and support it needs to function at its best. By making these difficult decisions and taking decisive action, the government can transform the current state of chaos into a well-organized and effective military command structure, better equipped to face the challenges of today and tomorrow.

FAQ